Presentation QA Reference 010: Read-First Review of Three Records

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00049.presentation-qa-reference-010 Date: 2026-10-07 Scope: content/reference/empathegy/ — the three records assigned by workload issue #781

What changed

Read all three assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line, including the appended Related Aphorisms/Haikus/Limericks residue in each.
fref-0750-pxcm.md line 26: italicized "whether the warmth had leverage", the second half of the record's self-declared "decisive question". The record already spends its bold on the defined term and the Interlocks labels, so italics were used instead. Asterisks only.
fref-0760-rscl.md line 173: bolded "cannot be repaired by polishing the same language harder", the Handling Protocol's one categorical rule and the record's single bold pivot. The record previously carried no bold. Asterisks only.
fref-0770-rhkd.md was reviewed unchanged.

What was deliberately left alone

All frontmatter, canonical IDs, tags, headings, {#...} anchors, hard breaks, the residue sections, and the Related Entries / Incident Anchors lists, including the LLG-08xx placeholders.
fref-0760-rscl.md line 13 still introduces its term in plain text, where its neighbours bold theirs. Matching them would be cross-record standardization, not a decision about this record.
fref-0770-rhkd.md line 26 has the same "the question is not X; the question is Y" shape as 0750 line 26. Giving it the same italic would be a template, and the record already carries six bold spans plus "A key sign:" at line 114.
fref-0760-rscl.md line 158 reads "The systems ability". It was not corrected; that is a wording question, not a formatting one.

Verification performed

./bin/validate_graph.sh with the pinned Boris: passed.
python3 scripts/test_presentation_qa.py: passed.
Compiled-article inspection of all three records.

Unresolved follow-up

The missing apostrophe at fref-0760-rscl.md line 158 is flagged for the maintainer to keep as residue or correct separately.