Presentation QA Limericks 021: Read-First Review of 22 Records

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00141.limericks-021 Date: 2026-10-08 Scope: content/limericks/ — the 22 records assigned by workload issue #687 (lim-fref-0200-cbac through lim-fref-0420-ancl)

What changed

  • Read all 22 assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line. Every assigned file was identical to snapshot 8997eebee2a4e620c5dd47fcea97abf515c4cac6 at review time; no intervening diffs to disclose.
  • Verified the task premise before editing: this lowercase lim-fref-* range was never covered by the editorial emphasis passes (those ended at sorted-path record 200, LIM-LLG-SYS-8-REINDEX-02). All 22 records arrived fully plain — no bold, no italics — so each was evaluated on its own merits rather than inherited.
  • lim-fref-0290-ocvh.md line 56: bolded "I don't really know what they mean." — the filing narrator's own admission of incomprehension, the one crack in the record's clean-narrative surface. Asterisks only; trailing two-space hard break preserved.
  • lim-fref-0320-cseq.md line 64: bolded "And then it was Tuesday again." — the closing deadpan payoff of the credential-cycle conceit. Asterisks only.
  • lim-fref-0340-tsab.md line 40: bolded "Don't ask me to read anymore." — the stanza-final imperative where the narrator breaks protocol voice and refuses the assignment. Asterisks only.
  • lim-fref-0360-sast.md line 32: bolded "So feelings are now disallowed." — the causal payoff naming the record's conceit. Asterisks only.
  • lim-fref-0400-metr.md line 45: bolded "We logged it as "poultry occurred."" — the record's sharpest empathy-to-paperwork compression. Asterisks only.
  • lim-fref-0410-sclb.md line 56: bolded "Now go do the process again." — the Listening Board's empty dismissal, stanza-final. Asterisks only.

What was deliberately left alone

  • All frontmatter, canonical IDs, titles, tags, stanza structure, indentation, two-space hard breaks, quoted/documentary material, and all verse wording.
  • Twelve records reviewed unchanged: lim-fref-0210-cbhn, -0220-ccmp, -0230-cmal, -0240-cmrc, -0250-prdm, -0260-bmdh (device is four distributed quoted euphemisms — no single pivot), -0270-bmdc (period-staccato stanza already self-marks), -0280-cbnd, -0310-clop, -0330-tsac, -0350-bhds (noted as "learning." already carries quotation marks), -0380-lbkp.
  • Quote-style anomalies inside protected verse flagged as needs decision on #687, left as found: lim-fref-0200-cbac.md line 46 (curly It’s beside ASCII policy's at line 47), lim-fref-0300-clob.md line 37 (There’s), lim-fref-0370-dcst.md line 72 (continuity’s), lim-fref-0420-ancl.md line 44 (there’s).

Verification performed

  • git diff on the six changed records: asterisks only; asterisk-strip equality against HEAD confirmed for all six; per-line trailing whitespace preserved byte-for-byte.
  • BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh — passed: Boris graph diagnostics, full Cantilever compile, verse residue check, Filed certification.
  • Compiled HTML inspected: exactly one <strong> per changed record, all <br> hard breaks intact, no stray delimiters.
  • python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py — PASS after updating the changelog trunk count and README totals.

Unresolved follow-up

  • Four needs decision items posted on #687: the curly-apostrophe anomalies at lim-fref-0200-cbac:46, lim-fref-0300-clob:37, lim-fref-0370-dcst:72, and lim-fref-0420-ancl:44. The issue stays open until the maintainer resolves or explicitly waives them.