Presentation QA Lorelog 004: Read-First Review of Six Records

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00146.lorelog-004 Date: 2026-10-08 Scope: content/lorelog/ — the six records assigned by workload issue #702 (LLG-0114-SOMA, LLG-0115-TNS, LLG-0217-CNTR, LLG-0218-FSD, LLG-0220-UIS, LLG-0223-EFA)

What changed

• Read all six assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line, including the Related Aphorisms/Haikus/Limericks residue in each. Four records carried intervening commits since snapshot 8997eebee2a4e620c5dd47fcea97abf515c4cac6 — LLG-0217-CNTR.md, LLG-0218-FSD.md, LLG-0220-UIS.md, and LLG-0223-EFA.md each gained two-space hard-break restorations on closing verse stanzas (the archive-wide verse hard-break work); LLG-0114-SOMA.md and LLG-0115-TNS.md were unchanged at review time.
• LLG-0114-SOMA.md line 19: bolded "feelings should not be allowed to outnumber available policy responses" — the clause where the questionnaire becomes a litigant in its own case, restated verbatim by the aphorism residue at line 32. The prose carried no prior emphasis. Asterisks only.
• LLG-0217-CNTR.md line 20: bolded "redefining the metric calculation to exclude Forms 23-O and 24-O from the denominator" — the resolution the incident report builds to, where the fix adjusts the metric rather than the forms, echoed by the aphorism residue at line 51. Asterisks only.

What was deliberately left alone

• All frontmatter, canonical IDs, titles, relations, {#...} heading anchors, verse stanzas, two-space hard breaks (including the post-snapshot restorations), quoted/documentary material, existing italic emphasis in the limerick residue, and the double-blank-line residue spacing throughout.
• LLG-0115-TNS.md reviewed unchanged: emphasis is already spent on "Tone Normalization Sweep (TNS)" (line 16), the three chartered objectives (lines 46–50), the liaison appointment (line 75), the three routing rules (lines 92, 96, 101), and the directive names (lines 131–135), plus a retained redacted-comment blockquote (lines 122–123). Any addition would have been decoration.
• LLG-0218-FSD.md reviewed unchanged: the prose already carries six bold spans — "A-versions" (line 16), "Form 51-E-A" (line 22), "editing surfaces" (line 28), "real" (line 34), "decorative" (line 46), "pending" (line 55). Existing emphasis is not removed mechanically; no concern warranted escalation.
• LLG-0220-UIS.md reviewed unchanged: its one pivot position is already occupied by "Form 09-I Unified Intake Sheet" (line 11), with italic field labels and directive outputs (lines 17, 33–35, 45).
• LLG-0223-EFA.md reviewed unchanged: same pattern — existing bold on "Form EFA-1 Emotional Filing Appeal" (line 11) and italics on the mandatory prompts and rejection notice (lines 18–19, 34).
• LLG-0114-SOMA.md line 15 allocates provisional codes F17–F93 (77 codes) while its aphorism residue at line 44 claims "76 new administrative emotions." The off-by-one between prose and aphorism registers is preserved as archival ambiguity, not a formatting matter.
• LLG-0217-CNTR.md line 190 reads "C.U.N.T.I.E.R.' bliss" — an apostrophe where the acronym would take a period. Preserved as residue; verse is not corrected.

Verification performed

• BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh — passed: Boris graph diagnostics, full Cantilever compile, verse residue check, HTML ID audit, Filed certification.
• git diff on the two changed records confirms emphasis markers only; no word, order, ID, link, or whitespace changes.
• python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py — PASS after updating the changelog trunk count and README totals.

Unresolved follow-up

• None. The intervening hard-break commits on four records were disclosed above; no :::note fences or list-item verse stanzas were found in the assignment.