Presentation QA Lorelog 009: Read-First Review of Seven Records

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00150.lorelog-009 Date: 2026-10-08 Scope: content/lorelog/ — the seven records assigned by workload issue #707 (LLG-0333-MEO, LLG-0334-CSI, LLG-0336-CSE, LLG-0338-SBI, LLG-0339-SIRC, LLG-0340-BPO, LLG-0341-LME)

What changed

• Read all seven assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line, including embedded aphorism, haiku, and limerick residue. Every assigned file was identical to snapshot 8997eebee2a4e620c5dd47fcea97abf515c4cac6 at review time; no intervening diffs to disclose.
• LLG-0340-BPO.md line 24: bolded "Its jurisdiction ends at the chart." — the standalone thesis line of the Mandate section, literalized again by the embedded limerick couplet at lines 146–148. The record carried no prior emphasis. Asterisks only.
• LLG-0341-LME.md line 64: bolded "It changes how missing signatures are perceived." — the epistemic pivot closing the consent-chain pair at lines 62–64; the Lodge changes perception, not facts. The record carried no prior emphasis. Asterisks only.
• Recounted content/changelog/ source records, including this docket, and set the trunk's Count: to 104. README totals updated to match source: 2,309 pages, 11 trunks, 2,298 satellites.

What was deliberately left alone

• All frontmatter, canonical IDs, titles, tags, relations, heading anchors ({#...} dedupe anchors appear throughout), stanza structure, indentation, two-space hard breaks, blockquotes, and all quoted/documentary material.
• LLG-0333-MEO.md and LLG-0334-CSI.md: reviewed unchanged. Both are a one-paragraph lead followed entirely by embedded aphorism/haiku/limerick residue; no emphasis existed and no mid-sentence decoration was earned.
• LLG-0336-CSE.md: reviewed unchanged. Already carries five bold spans and italicized quoted phrases from an earlier era; the rubric neither permits adding to nor mechanically removes existing emphasis.
• LLG-0338-SBI.md: reviewed unchanged. Existing bold/italic emphasis present. The duplicate ## Interpretation Constraint Layer {#interpretation-constraint-layer-2} section at lines 70–72 (containing only ... and a repeated constraint line) was examined and judged deliberate archival residue about interpretive uncertainty — not a paste defect. Left exactly as found.
• LLG-0339-SIRC.md: reviewed unchanged. Carries roughly twenty bold spans across its chamber transcripts; an indented limerick stanza embedded inside ## Related Aphorisms at lines 190–194 was left exactly as found.
• No :::note fences and no list-item verse stanzas exist in the assigned set; nothing required flagging or normalization under those headings.

Verification performed

• BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh — passed: Boris graph diagnostics plus full Cantilever compile.
• git diff on the two changed records confirms emphasis markers only; no word, order, ID, link, or whitespace changes. Compiled HTML shows exactly one new <strong> per changed record with all <br> hard breaks and indented couplets intact.
• python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py — PASS after updating the changelog trunk count and README totals.

Unresolved follow-up

• None. The duplicate-section residue in LLG-0338-SBI is disclosed above as a judgment call rather than a needs decision item; the maintainer may reopen it if they disagree.