Presentation QA Lorelog 029: Read-First Review of Seven Records

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00170.lorelog-029 Date: 2026-10-08 Scope: content/lorelog/ — the seven records assigned by workload issue #727 (LLG-SYS-8-REINDEX-02, LLG-TDCIP-OVERCOH, OCV-0409-TSC, OCV-INTAKE-LOG, SRB-SESSION-NOTES, TSA-SESSION-SCHEDULE, map-inc-14)

What changed

• Read all seven assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line, including related-residue appendices. All seven files are byte-identical to snapshot 8997eebee2a4e620c5dd47fcea97abf515c4cac6; no intervening diffs.
• OCV-0409-TSC.md line 13: bolded "This was judged useful for circulation and unsafe for memory." — the adjudication sentence where the calm explanation is ruled unsafe for memory. Sole emphasis in the record.
• SRB-SESSION-NOTES.md line 38: bolded "The phrase is accepted." — the quiet capitulation where the stability-period euphemism wins. Sole emphasis in the record.
• TSA-SESSION-SCHEDULE.md line 91: bolded "No further explanation is filed." — the terminal shrug closing the Session Anomalies section. The record's only prose emphasis; its eight session-label bolds are structural.
• map-inc-14.md line 22: bolded "The incident remains open in narrative terms but is closed at every procedural layer that counts." — the record's closing thesis. Care taken to leave the identical sentence unbolded in the Related Aphorisms residue at line 37.
• Recounted content/changelog/ source records, including this docket, and set the trunk's Count: to match. README totals updated to match source.

What was deliberately left alone

• LLG-SYS-8-REINDEX-02.md unchanged: already carries roughly fifteen bold spans (bolded H1, cluster and protocol names, the six bolded status-list values). A further pivot would be decoration, not emphasis.
• LLG-TDCIP-OVERCOH.md unchanged: already carries roughly eighteen bold spans (the five-stage pipeline chain, signature labels, corrective-action verbs). Saturated.
• OCV-INTAKE-LOG.md unchanged: five entries built on one template; every comment already sits in a blockquote and every Vault classification already carries italics. Bold inside one entry would elevate it over its four siblings.
• All frontmatter, canonical IDs, titles, tags, relations, headings and {#...} anchors, lists, blockquotes (including the > -prefixed continuation lines in OCV-INTAKE-LOG), inline code spans, and all verse: every haiku and limerick stanza, indentation, and two-space hard break.
• map-inc-14.md's six [^1] footnote references, which have no definitions anywhere in the corpus. Boris renders them as literal [^1] text — verified in the compiled HTML — so they read as one more dangling citation in a record about managed absence. Noted, not touched; any fix would be a word change.
• The empty ## Related Haikus section in OCV-0409-TSC — residue, left as found.
• OCV-INTAKE-LOG.md lines 46–47 and SRB-SESSION-NOTES.md lines 46–47 verse-like quoted fragments and indented continuations — left exactly as found per the verse-style review hold.
• All pre-existing trailing two-space residue in prose list items — generation-era collection style, not touched.

Verification performed

• BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh — passed: Boris graph diagnostics, full Cantilever compile, verse residue check, HTML ID audit, certification proof.
• python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py — PASS after updating the changelog trunk count and README totals.
• git diff — four changed lines across seven records, emphasis markers only; no word, order, ID, link, whitespace, or stanza changes. Compiled HTML inspected for each changed record: exactly one new <strong> per record, all <br> hard breaks and stanza structure intact.

Unresolved follow-up

• None. No :::note fences, no list-item verse stanzas requiring normalization, no non-formatting defects found in the assigned set.