Presentation QA Reference 005: Empathegy Continuity Doctrine Pivots

Maintenance ID: 0.1.00215.reference-005 Date: 2026-10-08 Scope: content/reference/empathegy/fref-0600-ccph.md, content/reference/empathegy/fref-0610-cthr.md, content/reference/empathegy/fref-0620-cwsh.md (issue #776)

What changed

fref-0600-ccph.md line 26: bolded crossed from translation into laundering — the Foundational Rule's pivot, which the record's five phrase classes operationalize.
fref-0610-cthr.md line 107: bolded prevent the archive from forgetting that reliance was there — the Register Note's telos, the record's stated reason for existing.
fref-0620-cwsh.md line 165: bolded protected from contradiction instead of tested by it — the definitional boundary closing the Distinguishing Rules section.
Emphasis markers only. No words, order, links, frontmatter, or anchors changed.

What was deliberately left alone

All documentary residue: the generated Related Aphorisms sentence pairs, duplicate-anchor headings ({#continuity-*-N}), the ## Haikus / ## Archival Residue subheadings, and all Related Haikus / Related Limericks verse including two-space hard breaks. The stray limerick about pencils at fref-0600-ccph.md lines 422-426 remains.
fref-0610-cthr.md line 106 The Registers purpose — a likely missing apostrophe (Register's). A word-level correction is outside presentation scope; flagged on #776 as needs decision.
Every other line of all three records. Each already reads plainly and earned no further emphasis.

Verification performed

BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh: PASS (see PR body for exact output).
python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py: PASS after recounting the changelog trunk to actual.
Compiled articles for all three records inspected: each renders a single <strong> span at the intended line; verse blocks and residue headings unchanged.

Unresolved follow-up

fref-0610-cthr.md line 106 missing apostrophe — recorded as needs decision on #776 for maintainer adjudication.