Presentation QA Reference 019: Two Bold Pivots Across Five Reference Records
Maintenance ID: 0.1.00221.reference-019
Date: 2026-10-08
Scope: content/reference/fref-0320-cseq.md, content/reference/fref-0330-tsac.md, content/reference/fref-0340-tsab.md, content/reference/fref-0350-bhds.md, content/reference/fref-0360-sast.md (presentation QA workload #790), plus this docket and the changelog trunk count
What changed
- Read all 5 assigned records in full, frontmatter through final line, against snapshot
8997eebe. Four of the five changed since the snapshot:ed4ff55brestored two-space hard breaks in Related Haikus stanzas of fref-0330, -0340, -0350, and -0360. Current files were reread; the intervening diff is whitespace-only verse-break restoration and was left exactly as found. fref-0330-tsac.mdline 21: boldedplausible exposure— the mandate's doctrinal hinge ("It does not certify competence. / It provides plausible exposure."), echoed verbatim in the record's Related Aphorisms residue.fref-0340-tsab.mdline 37: boldedDo not reconcile them yet.— the exercise's methodological crux; Part 1 forbids reconciling the two readings before Part 2 interrogates the assumptions beneath them.- Emphasis markers only. No words, order, frontmatter, links, anchors, or whitespace changed.
- Recounted
content/changelog/source records including this docket and set the trunkCount:accordingly; README page and satellite totals updated to match source.
What was deliberately left alone
fref-0320-cseq.md: bold is already the equivalency card's own term-field notation (twelve**Term** →entries across Roles/Artifacts/Practices); a competing prose bold would read as decoration.fref-0350-bhds.md: already emphasis-dense — classification field labels, the bolded "Precedence note — state chronology." lead-in, and italicized error-protocol phrasings.fref-0360-sast.md: bold already serves as the record's doctrinal-marker system; its thesis ("training echoes are haunted defaults, not bugs.") is already bold.- All
:::noteArchivist's Addenda and the stray five-line limericks that follow them, all Related Aphorisms / Haikus / Limericks appendices, and every verse hard break (protected per #824).
Verification performed
BORIS_BIN=/Users/tbuddy/dev/filed.fyi/bin/boris ./bin/validate_graph.sh: exit 0 — Boris graph diagnostics passed, Cantilever compile completed, verse residue check passed, 0 duplicate HTML IDs, Filed certification passed.- Compiled
reference/FREF-0330-TSAC.html:<strong>plausible exposure</strong>renders once in the Mandate; the Related Aphorisms quotation of the same sentence remains unbolded. - Compiled
reference/FREF-0340-TSAB.html:<strong>Do not reconcile them yet.</strong>renders; the record's only other strong tag is the addendum title. <br>counts on the five compiled pages: 62 / 46 / 43 / 45 / 52 — verse structure intact.python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py: PASS.
Unresolved follow-up
- Independent reviewer approval and green
validate,publish-export, and aggregatecichecks before merge.