Presentation QA Lorelog 08
Maintenance ID: 0.1.00238.lorelog-08
Date: 2026-10-09
Scope: content/lorelog/ — 14 records (LLG-0392-RCS through LLG-0401-GLP, issue #942 assignment)
What changed
Pass-2 (rich structure) presentation review of the lorelog-08 slice. Fourteen records read in full; eight earned transforms, six reviewed unchanged.
LLG-0392-RCS,LLG-0395-MSS,LLG-0397-SBF: the parallel "traced/performed/reconstructed ... through/using/from" evidence sentences split into verbatim item lists, matching the comma/anditem style already used inLLG-0392-SGL's consensus list.LLG-0399-OCS: seven literal record-ID mentions became wiki links (six edit sites) —FREF-0290-OCVH,LLG-0391-LAA(×2),LLG-0397-SBF(×2),FREF-0270-BMDC,LLG-0400-CMA-TSP— labels preserving source spelling including the record's non-breaking hyphens. Self-references toOCS-0399/CMA-TSPleft plain.LLG-0400-CMA-TSP: Bricky's margin-note lead-ins (Summary:,Trauma:,Goals:,Quirks:) became run-in bold labels; the prose mention of companion caseLLG-0399-OCSbecame a wiki link.LLG-0400-SCAS: cloned form numbersSOMA-14,51-E,SOMA-72,COMA-19(forms enumeration and the laterSOMA-14mention) became code spans.LLG-0400-TRIAD: the three bolded member-record IDs became wiki links inside the existing bold (LLG-0401-GLP,LLG-0402-GMP,LLG-0403-WBA).LLG-0401-GLP: theFinding:lead-in became a run-in label;UNSUREkept its existing bold.
Reviewed unchanged: LLG-0392-SGL, LLG-0393-BDA, LLG-0393-RBR,
LLG-0394-PRS, LLG-0396-MSP, LLG-0398-CCO — their enumerations are already
lists and no remaining prose runs earned a transform.
What was deliberately left alone
- All words, ordering, frontmatter, IDs, tags, relations, titles, and every
## Related *verse tail, including the two terminal limerick stanzas inLLG-0401-GLPthat duplicate earlier stanzas — intentional residue. - Stray
---separators ahead of the verse tails inLLG-0392-SGL(line 23) andLLG-0393-RBR(line 24) — pre-existing markup irregularity, preserved. LLG-0400-SCASline ~200:(see LLG-0000-NULL)references no record in the graph. Left plain — a null pointer to a null incident is on-brand residue, not a defect; flagged for maintainer awareness rather than filed as needs-decision.SA‑SS‑TEL(SCAS) and mascot designations (LC-04,BX-6,LX-2,AC-11) are natural-language node/name references, not canonical ID tokens — out of scope for the wiki-link transform.- Quoted artifact inscriptions (
save the good ribbon,Handle as shared certainty,We are basically there,As a former) left unmarked, matching corpus convention for such phrases. - Directive/subsystem acronyms (TNS, SBI, CSI, SIRC, MFX, C.U.N.T.I.E.R., FeelingSeeder) left plain — names, not document codes.
- Banner phrases in
LLG-0393-BDA/LLG-0393-RBRleft unmarked; italicizing quoted stitch-text would be emphasis for decoration, not structure.
Verification performed
python3 scripts/check_collection_counts.py: PASS after count updates../bin/validate_graph.sh: passed — Boris graph diagnostics, verse residue check, HTML ID audit (0 duplicates), filed certification.- Compiled output inspected for all eight changed records: wiki links resolve
to
lorelog/LLG-*.html/reference/FREF-*.htmltargets,**[[id|label]]**renders as linked strong text, code spans and new lists render correctly, and the GLP checkbox list/Finding:run-in are intact.
Unresolved follow-up
- Issue #942's gate cites pilot #934, which was still open and unmerged at the time this slice was worked; the assignment was released by the coordinator regardless. Recorded here so the sequencing decision is auditable.
LLG-0000-NULLhas no record; if maintainers later create one, the SCAS mention becomes a link candidate on a future pass.